<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEABCRU &#187; publications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seabcru.org/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=publications" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seabcru.org</link>
	<description>Southeast Asian Bat Conservation Research Unit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 22:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Decline of flying foxes could affect the durian industry</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2313</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2313#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2017 19:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheema Abdul Aziz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flying Foxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flying foxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An international team of researchers working in Peninsular Malaysia have found that the giant fruit bats known as flying foxes (Pteropus hypomelanus) are actually important pollinators for the durian (Durio zibethinus) tree, which produces a unique fruit that is highly popular throughout Southeast Asia and beyond. As this is the first time such a role has been documented for these highly threatened bats, it&#8217;s possible that a decline in their populations could potentially affect fruit production in the commercial durian industries of Southeast Asian countries.  Led by SEABCRU member Sheema Abdul Aziz, the study has recently been published in the journal Ecology and Evolution. Aziz SA, Clements GR, McConkey KR, Sritongchuay T, Pathil S, Yazid MNHA, Campos-Arceiz A, Forget P-M, Bumrungsri, S. 2017.  Pollination by the locally endangered island flying fox (Pteropus hypomelanus) enhances fruit production of the economically important durian (Durio zibethinus). Ecol Evol. 2017;00:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3213 From Tigga: You can read the press release from RIMBA (which has some great photos) here. &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An international team of researchers working in Peninsular Malaysia have found that the giant fruit bats known as flying foxes (<em>Pteropus hypomelanus</em>) are actually important pollinators for the durian (<em>Durio zibethinus</em>) tree, which produces a unique fruit that is highly popular throughout Southeast Asia and beyond. As this is the first time such a role has been documented for these highly threatened bats, it&#8217;s possible that a decline in their populations could potentially affect fruit production in the commercial durian industries of Southeast Asian countries.  Led by SEABCRU member Sheema Abdul Aziz, the study has recently been published in the journal <em>Ecology and Evolution</em>.</p>
<p>Aziz SA, Clements GR, McConkey KR, Sritongchuay T, Pathil S, Yazid MNHA, Campos-Arceiz A, Forget P-M, Bumrungsri, S. 2017.  Pollination by the locally endangered island flying fox (<em>Pteropus hypomelanus</em>) enhances fruit production of the economically important durian (<em>Durio zibethinus</em>). Ecol Evol. 2017;00:1–15. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3213">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3213</a></p>
<p>From Tigga: You can read the press release from RIMBA (which has some great photos) <a href="https://rimbaresearch.org/2017/09/19/publication-update-21-project-pteropus-press-release-durian-industry-may-suffer-without-endangered-fruit-bats/">here</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2313</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists find a new species of horseshoe bat from Southeast Asia by studying an old museum specimen</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2295</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2295#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pipat Soisook]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy and Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borneo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhinolophus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A team of international network of researchers describes a new species of woolly horseshoe bat from Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand). The new species is described from specimens in museums world-wide including a 32 years old spirit specimen. The study (led by SEABCRU member Pipat Soisook) is one of many output of an international collaborative network of researchers in different 11 institutions based in six different countries. The paper is published in the latest issue of Acta Chiropterologica. The first specimen of the new species was collected at around 1600 m on Gunung Trus Madi in Sabah, Malaysia, by Charles M. Francis in 1983. This specimen is kept in the Natural History Museum, London after since and was being regarded as a ‘melanistic’ Rhinolophus trifoliatus until this study. Together with additional specimens from Kalimantan, Indonesia and from Thailand, researchers, by using morphological, acoustic and genetic data, reveal that they are a new species to science. The new species then is named ‘Rhinolophus francisi’ to honor C. M. Francis for his great contribution in Southeast Asian bat taxonomy. The new species is currently known only from Sabah, Kalimantan in Borneo and Ratchaburi Province, W. Thailand. A single specimen from Thailand is described as a different subspecies, namely ‘Rhinolophus francisi thailandicus’ or Thailand’s Wooly Horseshoe Bat’. Anyway the authors mentioned that additional specimens from Thailand may prove that this Thai subspecies is a distinct species, and future surveys in forest habitats of mainland Southeast Asia may reveal that it is actually widespread in the region. Soisook, P., Struebig, M. J., Noerfahmy, S., Bernard, H., Maryanto, I., Chen, S. F., Rossiter, S. J., Kuo, H. C., Deshpande, K., Bates, P. J. J., Sykes, D. and Miguez, R. P. (2015) DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF THE RHINOLOPHUS TRIFOLIATUS-GROUP (CHIROPTERA: RHINOLOPHIDAE) FROM SOUTHEAST ASIA. Acta Chiropterologica, 17(1): 21–36]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2296" style="width: 258px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Rfrancisithailand.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2296" src="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Rfrancisithailand-248x300.jpg" alt="Rhinolophus francisi (photo Pipat Soisook)" width="248" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Rhinolophus francisi (photo Pipat Soisook)</p></div>
<p>A team of international network of researchers describes a new species of woolly horseshoe bat from Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand). The new species is described from specimens in museums world-wide including a 32 years old spirit specimen.</p>
<p>The study (led by SEABCRU member Pipat Soisook) is one of many output of an international collaborative network of researchers in different 11 institutions based in six different countries. The paper is published in the latest issue of Acta Chiropterologica.</p>
<p>The first specimen of the new species was collected at around 1600 m on Gunung Trus Madi in Sabah, Malaysia, by Charles M. Francis in 1983. This specimen is kept in the Natural History Museum, London after since and was being regarded as a ‘melanistic’ <em>Rhinolophus trifoliatus </em>until this study<em>. </em>Together with additional specimens from Kalimantan, Indonesia and from Thailand, researchers, by using morphological, acoustic and genetic data, reveal that they are a new species to science. The new species then is named <strong>‘<em>Rhinolophus francisi</em>’</strong> to honor C. M. Francis for his great contribution in Southeast Asian bat taxonomy.</p>
<p>The new species is currently known only from Sabah, Kalimantan in Borneo and Ratchaburi Province, W. Thailand. A single specimen from Thailand is described as a different subspecies, namely <strong>‘<em>Rhinolophus francisi thailandicus</em>’</strong> or Thailand’s Wooly Horseshoe Bat’. Anyway the authors mentioned that additional specimens from Thailand may prove that this Thai subspecies is a distinct species, and future surveys in forest habitats of mainland Southeast Asia may reveal that it is actually widespread in the region.</p>
<p>Soisook, P., Struebig, M. J., Noerfahmy, S., Bernard, H., Maryanto, I., Chen, S. F., Rossiter, S. J., Kuo, H. C., Deshpande, K., Bates, P. J. J., Sykes, D. and Miguez, R. P. (2015) DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF THE <em>RHINOLOPHUS TRIFOLIATUS</em>-GROUP (CHIROPTERA: RHINOLOPHIDAE) FROM SOUTHEAST ASIA. Acta Chiropterologica, 17(1): 21–36</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2295</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A dark knight with pads &#8211; a new Glischropus species from Sumatra</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2289</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2289#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Chun-Chia Huang]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy and Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glischropus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sumatra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy and systematics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They have typical Pipistrellus appearance but are characterized by the thickened pads at the base of thumbs. They roost in bamboo stalks but are not the flat-headed Tylonycteris of Southeast Asia nor the funnel-eared Kerivoula of Taiwan. The genus Glischropus is a group of small vespertilionid bats endemic to the Indo-Malayan region. Three species have been recognized, including G. bucephalus earlier described by Dr Gábor Csorba of the Hungarian Nature History Museum (HNHM) in 2013. However, this month, Dr Csorba, Tamás Görföl (HNHM), and four SEABCRU committee bring exciting news of another new Glischropus species. Based on morphological and genetic evidence, Glischropus aquilus, the fourth member of the genus, is reported from southwestern Sumatra of Indonesia. The bat is named for its dark coloration, which distinguishes the species from its three congeners. This finding brings the count of bats to 88 species for Sumatra and 222 species for Indonesia. The project is supported by a collaboration between four museums of four countries, highlighting the significance of SEABCRU taxonomic network. Thumb-pads up! Original Citation: Gábor Csorba, Tamás Görföl, Sigit Wiantoro, Tigga Kingston, Paul J. J. Bates, and Joe Chun-Chia Huang. Thumb-pads up—a new species of thick-thumbed bat from Sumatra (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae: Glischropus). Zootaxa 3980 (2): 267–278. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3980.2.7]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2292" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Glischropus-aquilus.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2292" src="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Glischropus-aquilus-300x199.jpg" alt="Glischropus aquilus (photo Joe Chun-Chia Huang)" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text"><em>Glischropus aquilus</em> (photo Joe Chun-Chia Huang)</p></div>
<p>They have typical <em>Pipistrellus</em> appearance but are characterized by the thickened pads at the base of thumbs. They roost in bamboo stalks but are not the flat-headed <em>Tylonycteris</em> of Southeast Asia nor the funnel-eared <em>Kerivoula</em> of Taiwan. The genus <em>Glischropus</em> is a group of small vespertilionid bats endemic to the Indo-Malayan region. Three species have been recognized, including <em>G. bucephalus</em> earlier described by Dr Gábor Csorba of the Hungarian Nature History Museum (HNHM) in 2013. However, this month, Dr Csorba, Tamás Görföl (HNHM), and four SEABCRU committee bring exciting news of another new <em>Glischropus</em> species. Based on morphological and genetic evidence, <em>Glischropus</em> <em>aquilus</em>, the fourth member of the genus, is reported from southwestern Sumatra of Indonesia. The bat is named for its dark coloration, which distinguishes the species from its three congeners. This finding brings the count of bats to 88 species for Sumatra and 222 species for Indonesia. The project is supported by a collaboration between four museums of four countries, highlighting the significance of SEABCRU taxonomic network. Thumb-pads up!</p>
<p><strong>Original Citation:</strong> Gábor Csorba, Tamás Görföl, Sigit Wiantoro, Tigga Kingston, Paul J. J. Bates, and Joe Chun-Chia Huang. Thumb-pads up—a new species of thick-thumbed bat from Sumatra (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae: <em>Glischropus</em>). Zootaxa 3980 (2): 267–278. DOI:<br />
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3980.2.7">http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3980.2.7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2289</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foraging ecology of Lyle&#8217;s flying fox revealed by GPS tracking</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2286</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2286#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 22:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marina Fisher-Phelps]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flying Foxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flying fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flying foxes are of ecological importance to Old World plants that depend on them for pollination and seed dispersal; however they are globally threatened by habitat loss and hunting. Lyle’s flying fox is of particular interest because it is a host for the Nipah virus, it frequently lives in areas densely inhabited by humans, and has been labeled as Vulnerable by the IUCN. Very little is known about this species’ foraging ecology and diet though the current study assumed that it is a central-place forager, which returns to a day roost after foraging. Using GPS telemetry to track activity patterns and resource use of bats roosting in Wat Luang temple in Chonburi Province, the researchers showed that individuals use agricultural landscapes within a 20-km radius of their day roost. Bats foraged on many different crops and native plants and the population is able to persist in an environment dominated by human activities. Bats consistently returned to foraging sites that had predictable food resources during a given time. Lyle’s flying fox visited a broad variety of plants but most of them were commercial fruits (42%) with mangoes, cashew, and tamarind being most commonly visited, though native fig species were also common in the diet. The stable food supply offered by agricultural crops may have fostered roost fidelity in the observed population of flying foxes. However, remnants of mangrove forests were also heavily used by individuals despite such sites being rare. Due to the bats using cash crops as a common food source these bats are considered pests by farmers and frequently hunted for bushmeat and traditional medicine. The close contact of bats to humans can result in population reductions through hunting that may be unsustainable but also facilitates transmission of the Nipah virus from the bats to humans. Understanding the foraging ecology of Lyle’s flying fox can help formulate better plans for managing the species’ population, preserving the ecological benefits they provide, and perhaps reduce disease transmission risk. Promotion of native vegetation particularly mangrove forests may help reduce conflict between bats and humans. Original Citation: Natalie Weber, Prateep Duengkae, Jakob Fahr, Dina K. N. Dechmann, Patcharakiti Phengsakul, Wachirapon Khumbucha, Boripat Siriaroonrat, Supaporn Wacharapluesadee, Pattarapol Maneeorn, Martin Wikelski, and Scott Newman. 2015. High resolution GPS tracking of Lyle’s Flying Fox between temples and orchards in Central Thailand. Journal of Wildlife Management, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.904.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flying foxes are of ecological importance to Old World plants that depend on them for pollination and seed dispersal; however they are globally threatened by habitat loss and hunting. Lyle’s flying fox is of particular interest because it is a host for the Nipah virus, it frequently lives in areas densely inhabited by humans, and has been labeled as Vulnerable by the IUCN.  Very little is known about this species’ foraging ecology and diet though the current study assumed that it is a central-place forager, which returns to a day roost after foraging. Using GPS telemetry to track activity patterns and resource use of bats roosting in Wat Luang temple in Chonburi Province, the researchers showed that individuals use agricultural landscapes within a 20-km radius of their day roost. Bats foraged on many different crops and native plants and the population is able to persist in an environment dominated by human activities. Bats consistently returned to foraging sites that had predictable food resources during a given time. Lyle’s flying fox visited a broad variety of plants but most of them were commercial fruits (42%) with mangoes, cashew, and tamarind being most commonly visited, though native fig species were also common in the diet. The stable food supply offered by agricultural crops may have fostered roost fidelity in the observed population of flying foxes.  However, remnants of mangrove forests were also heavily used by individuals despite such sites being rare. Due to the bats using cash crops as a common food source these bats are considered pests by farmers and frequently hunted for bushmeat and traditional medicine. The close contact of bats to humans can result in population reductions through hunting that may be unsustainable but also facilitates transmission of the Nipah virus from the bats to humans. Understanding the foraging ecology of Lyle’s flying fox can help formulate better plans for managing the species’ population, preserving the ecological benefits they provide, and perhaps reduce disease transmission risk. Promotion of native vegetation particularly mangrove forests may help reduce conflict between bats and humans.  </p>
<p>Original Citation: Natalie Weber, Prateep Duengkae, Jakob Fahr, Dina K. N. Dechmann, Patcharakiti Phengsakul, Wachirapon Khumbucha, Boripat Siriaroonrat, Supaporn Wacharapluesadee, Pattarapol Maneeorn, Martin Wikelski, and Scott Newman. 2015. High resolution GPS tracking of Lyle’s Flying Fox between temples and orchards in Central Thailand. Journal of Wildlife Management, DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.904.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2286</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First workshop publication &#8212; Guano harvesting in Myanmar by Thet Thet and Khin Mya Mya</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2266</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2266#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 21:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Racey]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cave Bats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guano harvesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myanmar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workshops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, IUCN published guidelines for minimising the negative impact of guano harvesting on bats and called for relevant studies. The first of these has now been published by Thet Thet and Khin Mya Mya of Mandalay University, Myanmar in the open-access Journal of Threatened Taxa. It provides clear evidence that the amount of guano harvested from a cave in central Myanmar occupied by 200,000 Taphozous theobaldi and Tadarida plicata remained relatively constant over a three year period, with some seasonal variation, indicating that the bats were not disturbed by the harvesting.  A single family has held a licence for over 40 years from the local Forestry Department to harvest the guano, and this has clearly been an important factor in its sustainability. Thet Thet &#38; Khin Mya Mya (2015) Harvesting the guano of insectivorous bats: is it sustainable? Journal of Threatened Taxa 7: 7296-7297. Abstract A three year study of the weight of guano removed from a single cave in Myanmar, from which guano has been extracted for over forty years, indicates that such harvesting is sustainable. The cave is occupied by an estimated 200,000 bats, mostly Tadarida plicata. An annual licence is issued by the Forestry Department to a single family which extracted an average of 36 tons of guano each year from 2003 to 2005. The guano is transported 350 km to Lake Inle where it is sold to fertilise tomatoes. SPECIAL NOTE FROM TIGGA: This is the first publication to arise from the publishing workshop embedded within the SEABCRU Bat Conservation Workshop at the University of Mandalay in August 2014. CONGRATULATIONS from all at SEABCRU to Thet Thet and Khin Mya Mya in bringing this to completion, and a special thanks to Paul Racey for liaising with the journal. I look forward to many more publications featuring the great work being done in Myanmar!]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, IUCN published <a href="https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_guidelines_for_minimizing_the_negative_impact_to_bats_and_other_cave_organisms_f.pdf">guidelines</a> for minimising the negative impact of guano harvesting on bats and called for relevant studies. The first of these has now been published by Thet Thet and Khin Mya Mya of Mandalay University, Myanmar in the open-access Journal of Threatened Taxa. It provides clear evidence that the amount of guano harvested from a cave in central Myanmar occupied by 200,000 <em>Taphozous</em> <em>theobaldi</em> and <em>Tadarida</em> <em>plicata</em> remained relatively constant over a three year period, with some seasonal variation, indicating that the bats were not disturbed by the harvesting.  A single family has held a licence for over 40 years from the local Forestry Department to harvest the guano, and this has clearly been an important factor in its sustainability.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.threatenedtaxa.org/ZooPrintJournal/2015/May/o419626v147296-7297.pdf"><strong>Thet Thet &amp; Khin Mya Mya (2015) Harvesting the guano of insectivorous bats: is it sustainable? Journal of Threatened Taxa 7: 7296-7297.</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Abstract </strong>A three year study of the weight of guano removed from a single cave in Myanmar, from which guano has been extracted for over forty years, indicates that such harvesting is sustainable. The cave is occupied by an estimated 200,000 bats, mostly <em>Tadarida plicata</em>. An annual licence is issued by the Forestry Department to a single family which extracted an average of 36 tons of guano each year from 2003 to 2005. The guano is transported 350 km to Lake Inle where it is sold to fertilise tomatoes.</p>
<p><strong>SPECIAL NOTE FROM TIGGA: This is the first publication to arise from the publishing workshop embedded within the <a href="http://www.seabcru.org/1516">SEABCRU Bat Conservation Workshop </a>at the University of Mandalay in August 2014. CONGRATULATIONS from all at SEABCRU to Thet Thet and Khin Mya Mya in bringing this to completion, and a special thanks to Paul Racey for liaising with the journal. I look forward to many more publications featuring the great work being done in Myanmar!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2266</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you fancy a painted woolly bat on your wall? What about a false vampire?</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2254</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2254#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Lee]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forest Bats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A frequent traveller browsing the tourist shops and markets of Southeast Asia and East Asia will invariably be introduced to many bats, although very dead and mounted. How are such bats collected in the wild and in what numbers? What is the volume of internet trade involving such souvenirs? The harvest of bats for the mounted souvenir trade involves no less than 10 species and the most iconic species used in the souvenir market is the woolly painted bat (Kerivoula picta) – a small bat prized for its bizarre colours. The continued harvest of this species and others could be detrimental to their wild populations, exacerbated by other threats such as habitat loss and disturbance. My personal interest in the wildlife trade prompted me to write a short communication with a few SEABCRU members after a trip to south Vietnam last year to highlight the sale of bat souvenirs and the urgent need to investigate its sustainability. The article can be read here: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&#38;aid=9625794&#38;fulltextType=NW&#38;fileId=S0030605315000034 Benjamin P. Y-H. Lee, Matthew J. Struebig, Stephen J. Rossiter and Tigga Kingston (2015). Increasing concern over trade in bat souvenirs from South-east Asia. Oryx 49(2): 204.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2255" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Mounted-bats.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2255" src="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Mounted-bats-300x225.jpg" alt="Mounted bats in the tourist markets of Ho Chi Minh City (photo Ben Lee)" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mounted bats in the tourist markets of Ho Chi Minh City &#8212; sadly just the tip of the iceberg (photo Benjamin Lee)</p></div>
<p>A frequent traveller browsing the tourist shops and markets of Southeast Asia and East Asia will invariably be introduced to many bats, although very dead and mounted. How are such bats collected in the wild and in what numbers? What is the volume of internet trade involving such souvenirs? The harvest of bats for the mounted souvenir trade involves no less than 10 species and the most iconic species used in the souvenir market is the woolly painted bat (<em>Kerivoula picta</em>) – a small bat prized for its bizarre colours. The continued harvest of this species and others could be detrimental to their wild populations, exacerbated by other threats such as habitat loss and disturbance.</p>
<p>My personal interest in the wildlife trade prompted me to write a short communication with a few SEABCRU members after a trip to south Vietnam last year to highlight the sale of bat souvenirs and the urgent need to investigate its sustainability. The article can be read here:</p>
<p><a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;aid=9625794&amp;fulltextType=NW&amp;fileId=S0030605315000034">http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;aid=9625794&amp;fulltextType=NW&amp;fileId=S0030605315000034</a></p>
<p>Benjamin P. Y-H. Lee, Matthew J. Struebig, Stephen J. Rossiter and Tigga Kingston (2015). Increasing concern over trade in bat souvenirs from South-east Asia. Oryx 49(2): 204.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2254</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you rather be bitten by Hipposideros diadema or Kerivoula intermedia?</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2246</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2246#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tigga Kingston]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forest Bats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecomorphology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the title Julie and I did not use in the outreach promoting her paper looking at bite force in 35 species of Malaysian bats (we talked about dogs instead). If you said Hipposideros diadema,  you really need to read the paper, and if you said the Kerivoula you probably intuitively got the main finding of the paper, that how hard a bat bites scales with size. However, the relationships between size and bite force differ across families and mechanical advantage plays a role independent of size. There is a very nice general public summary that Julie put together here (scroll down until you see Julie with a Cheiromeles :-)) For those interested in the use of collections for ecological research, the paper provides regression equations for the major families (Rhinolophidae, Hipposideridae, Vespertilionidae) that can be used to estimate bite force from skull parameters and even field measures (body mass and forearm length). Juliana Senawi, Daniela Schmieder, Bjorn Siemers and Tigga Kingston (2015). Beyond size &#8211; morphological predictors of bite force in a diverse insectivorous bat assemblage from Malaysia. Functional Ecology doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12447 You can email Julie or myself for a pdf.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2248" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Hidi-side-face.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2248" src="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Hidi-side-face-300x252.jpg" alt="Personally, I'd rather not be bitten by Hipposideros diadema (photo Tigga Kingston)" width="300" height="252" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Personally, I&#8217;d rather not be bitten by Hipposideros diadema (photo Tigga Kingston)</p></div>
<p>This was the title Julie and I <strong>did not </strong>use in the outreach promoting her paper looking at bite force in 35 species of Malaysian bats (we talked about dogs instead). If you said <em>Hipposideros diadema,  </em>you really need to read the paper, and if you said the <em>Kerivoula </em>you probably intuitively got the main finding of the paper, that how hard a bat bites scales with size. However, the relationships between size and bite force differ across families and mechanical advantage plays a role independent of size. There is a very nice general public summary that Julie put together <a href="http://www.functionalecology.org/view/0/summaries.html">here</a> (scroll down until you see Julie with a <em>Cheiromeles</em> :-))</p>
<p>For those interested in the use of collections for ecological research, the paper provides regression equations for the major families (Rhinolophidae, Hipposideridae, Vespertilionidae) that can be used to estimate bite force from skull parameters and even field measures (body mass and forearm length).</p>
<p>Juliana Senawi, Daniela Schmieder, Bjorn Siemers and Tigga Kingston (2015). Beyond size &#8211; morphological predictors of bite force in a diverse insectivorous bat assemblage from Malaysia. Functional Ecology doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12447</p>
<p>You can email Julie or myself for a pdf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2246</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eonycteris spelaea &#8212; an essential link in durian pollination networks.</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2237</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2237#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tigga Kingston]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flying Foxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bat-plant interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further documentation of just how wonderful Eonycteris spelaea is with a new paper out this month in the Journal of Pollination Ecology.  Pushpa Raj Acharya is the lead author, and here is a wonderful write-up on the history of Eonycteris spelaea studies and the significance of the study taken directly from the Journal&#8217;s press release: &#8220;One of Paul Racey’s first duties as a new lecturer in the University of Aberdeen in 1974 was to act as internal examiner for Anthony Start’s PhD thesis on the ecology of Eonycteris spelaea in peninsula Malaysia. Start had made the intriguing discovery of mangrove (Sonneratia) pollen in the faeces of Eonycteris in a roost 38km from the nearest mangrove swamp, providing convincing evidence of long distance foraging. Forty years later, Racey’s former PhD student and now Professor, Sara Bumrungsri has revealed the critical role of Eonycteris in pollinating Durio and Parkia, with crop values of USD 137 million in Southern Thailand, crucial to local livelihoods. Pushpa Raj Acharya, a Nepali who had already co-authored a monograph on the bats of Nepal, won a scholarship to carry out research for a PhD by Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai and used radiotracking to study the foraging behavior of Eonycteris. He showed that the bats moved up to 8 km between patches of durian and by transferring pollen between patches, were the main agents of cross pollination. A major concern is the conservation status of Eonycteris, colonies of which live in caves, but the numbers of bats in these colonies are decreasing as a result of hunting and disturbance. Durian fruit set is as low as 0 -1.4% in orchards where bats are not seen foraging. The message is clear: no bats – no durian! &#8221; Pushpa Raj Acharya, Paul A Racey, Sunthorn Sotthibandhu, Sara Bumrungsri (2015). Feeding behavior of the dawn bat (Eonycteris spelaea) promotes cross pollination of economically important plants in Southeast Asia. Journal of Pollination Ecology 15: 44-50. You can get a copy from Pushpa &#8212; email him at pushpa underscore psu at yahoo dot com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1947" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/DSC_0038.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1947" src="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/DSC_0038-300x200.jpg" alt="&quot;Its me again .. Eonycteris spelaea   pollinator extraordinaire!&quot; (photo T. Kingston)" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&#8220;Its me again ..<em> Eonycteris spelaea</em> pollinator extraordinaire!&#8221; (photo T. Kingston)</p></div>
<p>Further documentation of just how wonderful <em>Eonycteris spelaea </em>is with a new paper out this month in the Journal of Pollination Ecology.  Pushpa Raj Acharya is the lead author, and here is a wonderful write-up on the history of <em>Eonycteris spelaea </em>studies and the significance of the study taken directly from the Journal&#8217;s press release:</p>
<p>&#8220;One of Paul Racey’s first duties as a new lecturer in the University of Aberdeen in 1974 was to act as internal examiner for Anthony Start’s PhD thesis on the ecology of <em>Eonycteris spelaea</em> in peninsula Malaysia. Start had made the intriguing discovery of mangrove (<em>Sonneratia</em>) pollen in the faeces of <em>Eonycteris</em> in a roost 38km from the nearest mangrove swamp, providing convincing evidence of long distance foraging. Forty years later, Racey’s former PhD student and now Professor, Sara Bumrungsri has revealed the critical role of <em>Eonycteris</em> in pollinating Du<em>r</em>io and <em>Parkia</em>, with crop values of USD 137 million in Southern Thailand, crucial to local livelihoods. Pushpa Raj Acharya, a Nepali who had already co-authored a monograph on the bats of Nepal, won a scholarship to carry out research for a PhD by Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai and used radiotracking to study the foraging behavior of <em>Eonycteris</em>. He showed that the bats moved up to 8 km between patches of durian and by transferring pollen between patches, were the main agents of cross pollination. A major concern is the conservation status of <em>Eonycteris</em>, colonies of which live in caves, but the numbers of bats in these colonies are decreasing as a result of hunting and disturbance. Durian fruit set is as low as 0 -1.4% in orchards where bats are not seen foraging. The message is clear: no bats – no durian! &#8221;</p>
<p>Pushpa Raj Acharya, Paul A Racey, Sunthorn Sotthibandhu, Sara Bumrungsri (2015). Feeding behavior of the dawn bat (<em>Eonycteris spelaea</em>) promotes cross pollination of economically important plants in Southeast Asia. Journal of Pollination Ecology 15: 44-50.</p>
<p>You can get a copy from Pushpa &#8212; email him at pushpa underscore psu at yahoo dot com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2237</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists find a new genus of false vampire from Thailand</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2232</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2232#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pipat Soisook]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy and Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megaderma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A team of international scientists, led by two SEABCRU members, Dr. Pipat Soisook (Prince of Songkla University, Thailand) and Dr. Paul Bates (Harrison Institute, UK), discovered a new genus and species of false vampire. The new bat, namely Eudiscoderma thongareeae, is the sixth member of a small family Megadermatidae. It is named to reflect its disc-liked noseleaf and to honor Ms Siriporn Thongaree, the retired, former head of the Halabala Wildlife Research Station where the bat was found. The species is very rare and only known from 3 specimens collected from a small area. The finding suggests how little we know about biodiversity, particularly in the forest areas of SE Asia. The paper describing the new bat is published in the latest issue of Zootaxa. A copy of the full text pdf can be requested from the author, e-mail; pipat66@gmail.com Pipat Soisook, Amorn Prajakjitr, Sunate Karapan, Charles M. Francis &#38; Paul J. J. Bates (2015). A new genus and species of false vampire (Chiroptera: Megadermatidae) from peninsular Thailand. Zootaxa 3931 (4): 528-550.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2233" style="width: 222px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Euthongareae.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2233" src="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Euthongareae-212x300.jpg" alt="Eudiscoderma thongareeae (photo Pipat Soisook)" width="212" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text"><em>Eudiscoderma thongareeae</em> (photo Pipat Soisook)</p></div>
<p>A team of international scientists, led by two SEABCRU members, Dr. Pipat Soisook (Prince of Songkla University, Thailand) and Dr. Paul Bates (Harrison Institute, UK), discovered a new genus and species of false vampire. The new bat, namely <em>Eudiscoderma thongareeae, </em>is the sixth member of a small family Megadermatidae. It is named to reflect its disc-liked noseleaf and to honor Ms Siriporn Thongaree, the retired, former head of the Halabala Wildlife Research Station where the bat was found.</p>
<p>The species is very rare and only known from 3 specimens collected from a small area. The finding suggests how little we know about biodiversity, particularly in the forest areas of SE Asia.</p>
<p>The paper describing the new bat is published in the latest issue of Zootaxa. A copy of the full text pdf can be requested from the author, e-mail; <a href="mailto:pipat66@gmail.com">pipat66@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>Pipat Soisook, Amorn Prajakjitr, Sunate Karapan, Charles M. Francis &amp; Paul J. J. Bates (2015). A new genus and species of false vampire (Chiroptera: Megadermatidae) from peninsular Thailand. Zootaxa 3931 (4): 528-550.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2232</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Complex geographic variation in calls, morphology and genetic relationships in the Intermediate Horseshoe Bat</title>
		<link>http://seabcru.org/?p=2225</link>
		<comments>http://seabcru.org/?p=2225#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Chun-Chia Huang]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy and Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhinolophidae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy and systematics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Intermediate Horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus affinis) is one of the most common cave species using constant frequency (CF) calls in Southeast Asia. In the past, variations of morphology and echolocation calls within the species have been observed among different geographic populations. However, the patterns of intra-specific variations across its extent and phylogeographic relationships among traits had not been not been fully explored. Cambodian researcher, Mr. Saveng Ith, led research on the geographic variation of R. affinis in mainland Southeast Asia. With morphological data, the researchers validated the two named subspecies in the region and reported a third form from Vietnam and Myanmar. Echolocation calls also show high variation in peak frequency but the divergence cannot be correlated with morphological form nor maternal lineages. The mismatches between the three traits in this study pose further questions on how CF bat species shape their morphology and echolocation. The findings are published in the latest issue of Zoological Studies by Saveng and his collaborators, including another seven SEABCRU associates. &#160; Original Citation: Saveng Ith, Sara Bumrungsri, Neil M Furey, Paul JJ Bates, Monwadee Wonglapsuwan, Faisal Ali Anwarali Khan, Vu Dinh Thong, Pipat Soisook, Chutamas Satasook and Nikky M Thomas. Taxonomic implications of geographical variation in Rhinolophus affinis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in mainland Southeast Asia. Zoological Studies, 54(31): p 1-29.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2226" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DSC_0146.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2226" src="http://seabcru.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/DSC_0146-300x200.jpg" alt="A complicated chap -- Rhinolophus affinis from Malaysia. Photo Tigga Kingston" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A complicated chap &#8212; Rhinolophus affinis from Malaysia. Photo Tigga Kingston</p></div>
<p>The Intermediate Horseshoe bat<em> (Rhinolophus affinis)</em> is one of the most common cave species using constant frequency (CF) calls in Southeast Asia. In the past, variations of morphology and echolocation calls within the species have been observed among different geographic populations. However, the patterns of intra-specific variations across its extent and phylogeographic relationships among traits had not been not been fully explored. Cambodian researcher, Mr. Saveng Ith, led research on the geographic variation of <em>R. affinis</em> in mainland Southeast Asia. With morphological data, the researchers validated the two named subspecies in the region and reported a third form from Vietnam and Myanmar. Echolocation calls also show high variation in peak frequency but the divergence cannot be correlated with morphological form nor maternal lineages. The mismatches between the three traits in this study pose further questions on how CF bat species shape their morphology and echolocation.</p>
<p>The findings are published in the latest issue of <em>Zoological Studies</em> by Saveng and his collaborators, including another seven SEABCRU associates.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Original Citation</strong>: Saveng Ith, Sara Bumrungsri, Neil M Furey, Paul JJ Bates, Monwadee Wonglapsuwan, Faisal Ali Anwarali Khan, Vu Dinh Thong, Pipat Soisook, Chutamas Satasook and Nikky M Thomas. Taxonomic implications of geographical variation in Rhinolophus affinis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in mainland Southeast Asia. Zoological Studies, 54(31): p 1-29.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seabcru.org?feed=rss2&#038;p=2225</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
